Who the hell would believe in evolution???
#951
Guest_MONSTERENERGY
Posted 02 August 2008 - 06:48 AM
#952
Guest_6SuN$Jyp)Z!.]t%G
Posted 02 August 2008 - 01:00 PM
If God kills all the wicked, he's technically breaking his own laws, isn't he? Thou shalt not kill and whatnot? I don't like these "exceptions" people make. They're ridiculously hypocritical.you still don't get it do you? look around. how could God come down to earth to take possession of this place and rule it the way he likes unless he kills all the wicked in it since God is holy.
Where in the Bible does it say Satan rules the Earth?one day that will come but until then its pretty much Satans domain.
Hypocrisy saddens me, it really does. Whenever someone criticizes other members of their religion for not being fanatical enough, a kitten dies.America was once deemed a christian nation and 70% of people claim to be Christians. if you read the Bible and figure out the main jist of it you can tell that definetly not 70% of America is Christians(sorry for leaving it so open-ended i don't have time to explain all the despicable things that the majority of America has done).
There kind of are, but you just choose to ignore them for the benefit of your own religion. There are no real arguments that disprove that the Holy Walrus of Greenland created Christianity as a joke, either, using your logic.the dead sea scrolls makes this statement untrue.. there are still no REAL arguments that disprove Creation.
Please explain.like i read that evolutionist scientists tried to create organic substance with plain elements and it was impossible because they didn't have any proteins.
Capslock is cruise-control for cool. Also, we're not discussing the Big Bang, we're discussing the origin of species - evolution. Darwin was, as I've mentioned like five times earlier, a Christian.HOW WOULD THE BIG BANG CREATE DNA STRANDS TO CREATE LIVING BEINGS?????????????????????
You're using sources from an anti-evolution site to convince us? Good going! How about you learn how carbon dating works before you decide to argue against it? It measures the amount of radioactive material remaining. We know it works because radioactivity behaves in a specific manner. Granted, it's not 100% accurate, but it's around what, 97% accurate, so it's hardly a nonsense theory. Evolution does not contradict Christianity; only fanatic Christianity.it doesn't even make sense. also carbon dating on fossils doesn't work because you aren't actually measuring the real bone just the minerals that have hardened in the place of it so it actually has no organic substance. go to http://www.trueautho...cvse/carbon.htm for more info on the subject of carbon dating.
#953
Guest_Jouten
Posted 03 August 2008 - 11:59 AM
#954
Guest_The Shnazzyone
Posted 03 August 2008 - 11:18 PM
#955
Guest_CandyCain
Posted 04 August 2008 - 05:01 PM
Edited by CandyCain, 04 August 2008 - 05:03 PM.
#956
Guest_Props2U
Posted 05 August 2008 - 05:29 AM
#957
Guest_WSK
Posted 05 August 2008 - 08:44 PM
I disagree! Take that you monkey!...What are you talking about? Saying God doesn't exist based on current science is like saying ice cream doesn't exist based on the mating habits of a freshwater crocodile!Yes, Christianity is responsible for more evil than Stalin and Hitler put together; but that has nothing to do with anything. A lot of atheists still use silly arguments like the one I stated earlier to "disprove God".If God exists, she's a fickle pregnant dog with severe psychological problems, but that's just my opinion. If something bad happens, religious people either blame Satan or say it's part of a "divine plan" (which contradicts their concept of free will, but who cares? ignorance is something people have no problem living with). There is no logical reason for all the horrible events that occur around the world, unless God doesn't exist, or is a horrible horrible megalomaniac creature (but that's a-given).
#958
Guest_gamerlockheart
Posted 06 August 2008 - 05:28 AM
#959
Guest_timetoplay
Posted 06 August 2008 - 12:05 PM
#960
Guest_gamerlockheart
Posted 06 August 2008 - 04:00 PM
I believe it's intelligent design, I hate that excuse, "our puny minds would never understand". I'm not being arrogant but unless given a logical answer, I won't believe in anything.i beleive in an intelligent creation, and i dont really try too much to understand it..maybe we were never meant to understand the true nature of divinity..
#961
Guest_The Shnazzyone
Posted 06 August 2008 - 06:45 PM
Lol: translation; "I believe what i'm told to believe, thinking is hard"i beleive in an intelligent creation, and i dont really try too much to understand it..maybe we were never meant to understand the true nature of divinity..
Edited by The Shnazzyone, 06 August 2008 - 06:45 PM.
#962
Guest_AznxKien
Posted 07 August 2008 - 02:16 AM
#963
Guest_Jouten
Posted 07 August 2008 - 02:01 PM
#964
Guest_jan1594
Posted 08 August 2008 - 05:50 AM
#965
Guest_6SuN$Jyp)Z!.]t%G
Posted 08 August 2008 - 05:23 PM
By your logic, a dog would become sentient given enough time, then?Evolution does not favour intelligence, it favours survival. There are many examples of creatures losing intelligence through evolution in order to survive.Either way, would you assume an orangutan would evolve into a chimpanzee?So if evelution existed would apes become humans later?
"Actually" humans are defined by biologists as "great apes".Actually apes and Humans are different races.
#966
Guest_Deathguard
Posted 08 August 2008 - 06:49 PM
#967
Guest_Jouten
Posted 08 August 2008 - 07:47 PM
No.Humans are the "Homo" race. And Apes are the "Primates" race.Human and Apes evolved out of one ancestor just like cats and dogs.Human didn't evovle out of apes just as cats didn't evolve out of dogs."Actually" humans are defined by biologists as "great apes".
#968
Guest_6SuN$Jyp)Z!.]t%G
Posted 08 August 2008 - 09:52 PM
#969
Guest_Jouten
Posted 08 August 2008 - 10:12 PM
#970
Guest_6SuN$Jyp)Z!.]t%G
Posted 09 August 2008 - 02:18 AM
You're lecturing me on being rude? I suggest you examine your own posts and actions a few times over.Strictly speaking, the term "ape" can refer to a whole myriad of primates (excluding humans), whereas a "great ape" is a primate within a specific family - humans fit into this category. I just thought I'd clarify that. We are apes, but specifically: great apes. Don't you all feel great?It doesn't make you intelligenter when you insult others.However,just because they are the same family doesn't make them the same race.Ok some people say Human are apes, and some say Human are another race.I admit you are right, but don't be that rude -.-
#971
Guest_Jouten
Posted 09 August 2008 - 11:42 AM
#972
Guest_supabadman
Posted 09 August 2008 - 08:40 PM
#973
Guest_CandyCain
Posted 11 August 2008 - 08:15 AM
I completely agree with you.I have a valid reason why there are so little fossils.1. If they are eaten after they died, NO FOSSIL.2. Was the sad moist enough.3. Was there enough pressure.4. Was it the right temperature in that specific area. and yea. >:This is just a reply to the first post. Which is probably mentioned before, but I can't contain myself.Fossils are very hard to create. When you want to create a fossil, you don't simply throw a corpse into a mud pile. (that is self testable and is also why this world isn't riddled with bones) You need very specific conditions or preserve animals to the point where you can study it thoroughly. Considering that, the fact that we were able to connect branches of animal species, that is an enormous task. I don't really want to bash you too much because it's been done (you've been slapped senseless by other people with high school knowledge), it's just advertising your ignorance by posting such a stupid flaw to evolution, which can be explained by common sense really miffs me. You should be hogtied and forced to re learn basic high school principles.
#974
Guest_AZIN808
Posted 11 August 2008 - 09:35 AM
#975
Guest_The Shnazzyone
Posted 11 August 2008 - 06:18 PM
despite the poor spelling it's nice to see a religeous individual who is willing to bend for common sense. how come noone has brought up the biblical crux that there is two completly different explanations for how the world is created in genesis. I'd like to see thwe biblical community debate which one is the correct one and come to an absolute agreement before they come after science.i believe in evolution... and im catholic... it makes sense than we just popped out of nowhere. looking exactly as we were from the beggining of time








