Jump to content


Who the hell would believe in evolution???


  • Please log in to reply
1136 replies to this topic

#151 Guest_voltron_vs_megatron

Guest_voltron_vs_megatron
  • Guest
Offline

Posted 07 February 2006 - 09:09 AM

Of course its valid. I was using sarcasm to illustrate my point. If you look beyond the first impression you'll realize that i support evolution, and was pointing out the lack of evidence for other theory's as oppossed to evolution.

I'll repeat myself your first post didn't have the link so i'm going to think your a raveing looney, i still don't think it is valid in a serious decussion... sarcasm is just another form of belittleing peoples beliefs. If you want to argue that you believe in evolution fine you could have done that and still added you link to the spag monster.
  • 0

#152 Guest_Tequillah

Guest_Tequillah
  • Guest
Offline

Posted 07 February 2006 - 10:16 AM

I think I evolved from some weird mouldy thing found under the desk. AHH, That evolution. Sorry.
  • 0

#153 Guest_Chrystallene

Guest_Chrystallene
  • Guest
Offline

Posted 07 February 2006 - 01:17 PM

Of course its valid. I was using sarcasm to illustrate my point. If you look beyond the first impression you'll realize that i support evolution, and was pointing out the lack of evidence for other theory's as oppossed to evolution.

Just because there is a lack of evidence that disproves evolution, it does not mean we should accept evolution for all its entirity. If we are to use the same reasoning, then there is no reason not to believe a god made everything on earth. The arguement "Why not?" is very weak as it just passes the burden of proving to the other debater. Now, as for your "Why not?" please answer this: "When was the last time life naturally came from a non-living thing?"
  • 0

#154 Guest_Mirai Naza

Guest_Mirai Naza
  • Guest
Offline

Posted 04 June 2006 - 06:12 PM

I'm an evolutionist. For those of you who think that evolution explains how life came to be, please read on it. It has nothing to do with the origin of life itself.
  • 0

#155 Guest_Sublimo

Guest_Sublimo
  • Guest
Offline

Posted 05 June 2006 - 01:08 AM

I think, that as long as the human walks the earth, they will never stop evolving. All lifeforms adapt to the environment and it'll keep on doing that till the environment stops changing, which is most likely... never
  • 0

#156 Guest_Jabu

Guest_Jabu
  • Guest
Offline

Posted 05 June 2006 - 04:38 PM

My 2 cents:There IS a lot of evidence against evolution it's just that it's not very widespread(I wonder who's indoctrinating who?).

Edited by Jabu, 05 June 2006 - 04:41 PM.

  • 0

#157 Guest_Spiked_Neko

Guest_Spiked_Neko
  • Guest
Offline

Posted 05 June 2006 - 05:13 PM

Hm....you really can't believe in evolution though. It would seem that we may have evidence but then where did the first orgasm come from? WE can't come from nothing.....we had to have something way higher than us create us. :drool:
  • 0

#158 Guest_naielz

Guest_naielz
  • Guest
Offline

Posted 06 June 2006 - 05:29 AM

i belive in evolution, and revolution... and.. and... atoms and stuff
  • 0

#159 Guest_Jabu

Guest_Jabu
  • Guest
Offline

Posted 06 June 2006 - 03:59 PM

Hm....you really can't believe in evolution though. It would seem that we may have evidence but then where did the first orgasm come from? WE can't come from nothing.....we had to have something way higher than us create us. :D

Assuming you meant organism XD A big thing evolutionists can't explain is how the first life form came to be.
  • 0

#160 Guest_Antarrr

Guest_Antarrr
  • Guest
Offline

Posted 28 January 2007 - 06:34 AM

Actually, I think there is no such thing as evolution, its just a trace of same type of creatures looking alike and having some behaviours in common
  • 0

#161 Guest_Fenrir Hound

Guest_Fenrir Hound
  • Guest
Offline

Posted 28 January 2007 - 08:52 AM

yes u can see how humans evolved from primates its in the genes there are humans just as dumb as our monkey ansestors..
  • 0

#162 Guest_Mizukage-sama

Guest_Mizukage-sama
  • Guest
Offline

Posted 28 January 2007 - 01:44 PM

Well, maybe. Im kinda like both a creationist and evolutionist. more on the creationist side.Well, its kinda odd how only 1 in about more than 2 million species of life could have a working brain.but it does explain how our ancestors could have lived with the climate back then.
  • 0

#163 Guest_AnimaguS

Guest_AnimaguS
  • Guest
Offline

Posted 28 January 2007 - 01:52 PM

I believe in evolution...
  • 0

#164 Kula Diamond

Kula Diamond

    Muwhahaha!

  • Dragon's Guard
  • 288 posts
Online
Current mood: None chosen
Reputation: 639
Demi-God

Posted 28 January 2007 - 06:12 PM

All I'm saying is that although there is what evolutionists (in general, mind you) would like to present as substantial evidence in support of evolution, there is also an even greater amount of evidence (though oftenly suppressed or ignored)

If they admits that the evolution theory is wrong then they will have to admit that god exists thats why they ignore evidence.
  • 0

ZwTppag.gif

 

 


#165 Guest_COOLINS

Guest_COOLINS
  • Guest
Offline

Posted 28 January 2007 - 10:37 PM

MEOWOWOM POPOPO POINTS were deducted for this post by qcarachato
  • 0

#166 Guest_scythemantis

Guest_scythemantis
  • Guest
Offline

Posted 29 January 2007 - 01:20 AM

If they admits that the evolution theory is wrong then they will have to admit that god exists thats why they ignore evidence.

There is NOTHING I despise more than people who think this way. You sir know absolutely nothing about science.Scientists have never had anything against religion, and people who study - and support - evolution are exactly as likely to believe in God as anybody else.But it doesn't matter either way, because no, there ISN'T any evidence against evolution. Not one shred of anything tangible has ever, ever presented a problem for evolution scientists. There are no flaws. There are no holes. Our knowledge of it is as solid as a wall. Read a book already.
  • 0

#167 Guest_Malarkie

Guest_Malarkie
  • Guest
Offline

Posted 29 January 2007 - 01:34 AM

evolution may not be a fullproof Thesis, but it's alot harder to belive adam poped into existance from the allmighty 'god'.What I'm trying to say is noting is fullproof but evolution seems to be the most sloid thesis we have. lol look at scientolgy.
  • 0

#168 Guest_6810

Guest_6810
  • Guest
Offline

Posted 29 January 2007 - 01:43 AM

sigh, who cares? Honestly?I mean, if you're in this debate cos you want to go to heaven then nothing will convince you otherwise.If you are in it to prove something to someone (ie - god) nothing will convince you otherwise.Meanwhile - my $0.02.Evolution occurs over thousands of years, millions even. Human memory, at best only goes back a century. Once we go back over a hundred years, there are fewer records, no living witnesses, less photographs, paintings etc. Go back 500 years and what we know is virtually nothing, mediated through a handful of key texts... but it is never the whole storyGo back a 1000 years and things get even murkier. Europe is in the dark ages, China is a vast stretch of war. Islam is flourishing and there is no such thing as the USA as we know it today.Go back 2000 years and we have the Holy Roman empire. We actually know so little of this time, especially what happened outside of the imperial record keeping (ie - ordinary people and those untouched or otherwise destroyed by the romans)Go back 5000 years and what we know about humanity is very little.Say the human species evolved over a couple of million years - reliable record keeping can account for approximately 0.0001% of human history. Say in the average life span of the users of this board, that 0.0001% becomes even lower.Therefore what you see, and what you know of the history of evolution (if we go back 4 billion years, things get much murkier) then what you see and know is virtually nothing.Keep an open mind.
  • 0

#169 Guest_Adghar

Guest_Adghar
  • Guest
Offline

Posted 29 January 2007 - 07:35 AM

http://www.talkorigins.org/Proof your eyes.See if you can figure out that riddle.
  • 0

#170 Guest_Mast3rPi3c3

Guest_Mast3rPi3c3
  • Guest
Offline

Posted 29 January 2007 - 07:44 AM

First, this topic has absolutely nothing to do with God, and, though this is an off-topic discussion forum, it would be great if you could remain on the same subject for the duration of this conversation... This is simply a topic which questions the validity of evolution (a theory which I hold no respect for). If you want to talk about God, go to another forum. If you are interested in evolution, please, don't hold back to post evidence supporting it... Me, I just can't stop finding evidence to refute it. For example, carbon dating, one of the most pivotal tools used in proving evolution (or its length, anyways) has been disproven on many accounts, most memorably when it was used to test lava from Mt. St. Helens and found it to be 100,000 yrs old. Pretty accurate if you ask me... :D Another correlating point is that the dating of fossils is based upon sedimentary levels, which are formed by water and dirt over the years. The problem with this is that the number of levels depends upon the amount of water. You could have alot of layers from either what evolutionists believe, little water and lots of time, OR you could have the same number of layers with LOTS of water, maybe from a WORLDWIDE FLOOD??, and little time.

how can you not belive in evolution or god? how do you think we were created? dont you think dinosuars have evolved to todays creatures?
  • 0

#171 Guest_Adghar

Guest_Adghar
  • Guest
Offline

Posted 29 January 2007 - 07:48 AM

I'm pretty sure he believes in God, dude.
  • 0

#172 Guest_Cloud3z

Guest_Cloud3z
  • Guest
Offline

Posted 29 January 2007 - 09:04 AM

evolution happens around all the time. not just nature but technology. many things evolutionize yet we r ignorant and r blind and cant see it.
  • 0

#173

  • Guest
Offline
Reputation: 0

Posted 29 January 2007 - 11:31 AM

I have seen a lot of posts suggesting that we can't have just appeared. There is an experiment called the Miller-Urey experiment. This experiment proves that simple organisms can appear just like that with the right ingredients. The experiment uses water, methane, ammonia and hydrogen with electric sparks. This ingredients did create life.It is thought that the earths atmosphere when the earth was still young contained water, methane, ammonia and hydrogen and that there were lots of thunder storms this then like in the experiment would have created simple organisms.These simple organizing according to the evolution theory would have then evolved into the many different life forms we have today.This does not mean there is no God. Many people believe in this and still believe in a God because it still doesn't explain how the universe and the stars that created our solar system and us came to be.::Edit::Here is a link about the experiment. Miller-Urey Experiment

Edited by cooltoolfool, 29 January 2007 - 11:33 AM.

  • 0

#174 Guest_conflict555

Guest_conflict555
  • Guest
Offline

Posted 29 January 2007 - 11:45 AM

i believe in evolution, but i don't understand why someone like charles darwin could be bothered doing so much research! :D
  • 0

#175 Guest_Benjiroo

Guest_Benjiroo
  • Guest
Offline

Posted 29 January 2007 - 01:52 PM

There are millions of fossils and other examples of evolution, it just so happens that a state of preservation after millions of years is a very specific process, fossils are sedimentary rock imprinted with the footprint of what used to be a living organism, there isn't anything organic about a fossil so you're only going to find it in extreme situations.It just so happens that any piece of sedimentary rock always contains tons and tons of fossils, cliffs baring the right kind of rock are teeming with them.Evolution exists, I really do heart ignorance and blind faith.

Edited by Benjiroo, 29 January 2007 - 01:54 PM.

  • 0