I'll repeat myself your first post didn't have the link so i'm going to think your a raveing looney, i still don't think it is valid in a serious decussion... sarcasm is just another form of belittleing peoples beliefs. If you want to argue that you believe in evolution fine you could have done that and still added you link to the spag monster.Of course its valid. I was using sarcasm to illustrate my point. If you look beyond the first impression you'll realize that i support evolution, and was pointing out the lack of evidence for other theory's as oppossed to evolution.
Who the hell would believe in evolution???
#151
Guest_voltron_vs_megatron
Posted 07 February 2006 - 09:09 AM
#152
Guest_Tequillah
Posted 07 February 2006 - 10:16 AM
#153
Guest_Chrystallene
Posted 07 February 2006 - 01:17 PM
Just because there is a lack of evidence that disproves evolution, it does not mean we should accept evolution for all its entirity. If we are to use the same reasoning, then there is no reason not to believe a god made everything on earth. The arguement "Why not?" is very weak as it just passes the burden of proving to the other debater. Now, as for your "Why not?" please answer this: "When was the last time life naturally came from a non-living thing?"Of course its valid. I was using sarcasm to illustrate my point. If you look beyond the first impression you'll realize that i support evolution, and was pointing out the lack of evidence for other theory's as oppossed to evolution.
#154
Guest_Mirai Naza
Posted 04 June 2006 - 06:12 PM
#155
Guest_Sublimo
Posted 05 June 2006 - 01:08 AM
#156
Guest_Jabu
Posted 05 June 2006 - 04:38 PM
Edited by Jabu, 05 June 2006 - 04:41 PM.
#157
Guest_Spiked_Neko
Posted 05 June 2006 - 05:13 PM
#158
Guest_naielz
Posted 06 June 2006 - 05:29 AM
#159
Guest_Jabu
Posted 06 June 2006 - 03:59 PM
Assuming you meant organismHm....you really can't believe in evolution though. It would seem that we may have evidence but then where did the first orgasm come from? WE can't come from nothing.....we had to have something way higher than us create us.
#160
Guest_Antarrr
Posted 28 January 2007 - 06:34 AM
#161
Guest_Fenrir Hound
Posted 28 January 2007 - 08:52 AM
#162
Guest_Mizukage-sama
Posted 28 January 2007 - 01:44 PM
#163
Guest_AnimaguS
Posted 28 January 2007 - 01:52 PM
#164
Posted 28 January 2007 - 06:12 PM
If they admits that the evolution theory is wrong then they will have to admit that god exists thats why they ignore evidence.All I'm saying is that although there is what evolutionists (in general, mind you) would like to present as substantial evidence in support of evolution, there is also an even greater amount of evidence (though oftenly suppressed or ignored)

#165
Guest_COOLINS
Posted 28 January 2007 - 10:37 PM
#166
Guest_scythemantis
Posted 29 January 2007 - 01:20 AM
There is NOTHING I despise more than people who think this way. You sir know absolutely nothing about science.Scientists have never had anything against religion, and people who study - and support - evolution are exactly as likely to believe in God as anybody else.But it doesn't matter either way, because no, there ISN'T any evidence against evolution. Not one shred of anything tangible has ever, ever presented a problem for evolution scientists. There are no flaws. There are no holes. Our knowledge of it is as solid as a wall. Read a book already.If they admits that the evolution theory is wrong then they will have to admit that god exists thats why they ignore evidence.
#167
Guest_Malarkie
Posted 29 January 2007 - 01:34 AM
#168
Guest_6810
Posted 29 January 2007 - 01:43 AM
#169
Guest_Adghar
Posted 29 January 2007 - 07:35 AM
#170
Guest_Mast3rPi3c3
Posted 29 January 2007 - 07:44 AM
how can you not belive in evolution or god? how do you think we were created? dont you think dinosuars have evolved to todays creatures?First, this topic has absolutely nothing to do with God, and, though this is an off-topic discussion forum, it would be great if you could remain on the same subject for the duration of this conversation... This is simply a topic which questions the validity of evolution (a theory which I hold no respect for). If you want to talk about God, go to another forum. If you are interested in evolution, please, don't hold back to post evidence supporting it... Me, I just can't stop finding evidence to refute it. For example, carbon dating, one of the most pivotal tools used in proving evolution (or its length, anyways) has been disproven on many accounts, most memorably when it was used to test lava from Mt. St. Helens and found it to be 100,000 yrs old. Pretty accurate if you ask me...
Another correlating point is that the dating of fossils is based upon sedimentary levels, which are formed by water and dirt over the years. The problem with this is that the number of levels depends upon the amount of water. You could have alot of layers from either what evolutionists believe, little water and lots of time, OR you could have the same number of layers with LOTS of water, maybe from a WORLDWIDE FLOOD??, and little time.
#171
Guest_Adghar
Posted 29 January 2007 - 07:48 AM
#172
Guest_Cloud3z
Posted 29 January 2007 - 09:04 AM
#173
Posted 29 January 2007 - 11:31 AM
Edited by cooltoolfool, 29 January 2007 - 11:33 AM.
#174
Guest_conflict555
Posted 29 January 2007 - 11:45 AM
#175
Guest_Benjiroo
Posted 29 January 2007 - 01:52 PM
Edited by Benjiroo, 29 January 2007 - 01:54 PM.








